Federal University Oye-Ekiti Institutional Repository >
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES >
Department of Demography and Social Statistics >
Demography and Social Statistics Journal Publications >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.fuoye.edu.ng/handle/123456789/135

Title: Alone in the Void: Getting Real about the Tenuous and Fragile Nature of Modern Civilization
Authors: Paul C. Sutton
Keywords: Neo-classical economics
ecological economics
sustainability
Issue Date: 28-Nov-2012
Publisher: www.mdpi.com/journal/humanities
Citation: Frank Borman, Jim Lovell, and William Anders. Earthrise. NASA image of the day gallery. Available online: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_102.html (accessed on 14 August 2009).
Series/Report no.: Humanities;178-191
Abstract: It is estimated that roughly seventy billion human beings have lived out their lives on planet earth. It is very unlikely that any of the seven billion currently enjoying this planet will be living out the rest of their life any place else. Nonetheless, many of our movies and much of our literature envisions easy space travel that is scientifically unrealistic. On July 24th, 2012 Adam Frank, a professor of physics and astronomy, wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times titled: Alone in the Void. This article posited that humanity (Homo sapiens) lives on a planet that is, for all intents and purposes, alone in a vast empty space. Reader comments to this editorial ranged from people who were very confident we were destined to colonize other galaxies to people who had little faith that humanity would even exist on the earth one hundred years from now. The reader’s responses mirror dominant and minority world views of economic theory. The dominant neo-classical economic paradigm is optimistic and growth oriented with faith in technological solutions to pressing social and environmental problems; whereas, the minority paradigm of ecological economics posits a need to move toward a steady state economy governed by the laws of thermodynamics as the preferred path for human progress. I side with ecological economics regarding what collective choices will result in a better future for humanity.
Description: It is estimated that roughly seventy billion human beings have lived out their lives on planet earth. It is very unlikely that any of the seven billion currently enjoying this planet will be living out the rest of their life any place else. Nonetheless, many of our movies and much of our literature envisions easy space travel that is scientifically unrealistic. On July 24th, 2012 Adam Frank, a professor of physics and astronomy, wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times titled: Alone in the Void. This article posited that humanity (Homo sapiens) lives on a planet that is, for all intents and purposes, alone in a vast empty space. Reader comments to this editorial ranged from people who were very confident we were destined to colonize other galaxies to people who had little faith that humanity would even exist on the earth one hundred years from now. The reader’s responses mirror dominant and minority world views of economic theory. The dominant neo-classical economic paradigm is optimistic and growth oriented with faith in technological solutions to pressing social and environmental problems; whereas, the minority paradigm of ecological economics posits a need to move toward a steady state economy governed by the laws of thermodynamics as the preferred path for human progress. I side with ecological economics regarding what collective choices will result in a better future for humanity.
URI: http://repository.fuoye.edu.ng/handle/123456789/135
ISSN: 2076-0787
Appears in Collections:Demography and Social Statistics Journal Publications

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Alone in the Void_Getting Real about the Tenuous and Fragile Nature of Modern Civilization.pdf456.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback